-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added terms for reactor typ description #73
Conversation
Added terms for reactor types description.
Another concept in this family:
Regarding the submission:
|
vocabularies/voc4cat/0007102.ttl
Outdated
<https://w3id.org/nfdi4cat/voc4cat_0007102> | ||
a skos:Concept ; | ||
dcterms:identifier "voc4cat_0007102"^^xsd:token ; | ||
skos:definition "An archtype/ideal reactor type, in which a fluid is flowing through the pipe in a plug like manner. A reaction thus takes place over a certain distance in the reactor."@en ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the pref. label contains the term "plug", you can't use the same term as part of the definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it acceptable if I have a short definition of "plug" after using it in the text? I don't really find a good alternative for plug and recommend synonyms also do not sound promising (bung, connection, cork, filling, fitting, occlusion, river, spigot, stopple, tampon, wedge; as can be found at https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/plug). Rephrasing everything so that I indirectly have the definition for plug inside the text might only make the definition and text unnecessarily difficult.
Added terms for reactor typ description.
These terms where added: